Skip to main content

THAT 5-MINUTE PEP TALK BEFORE THE JOB

There are pep talks and there are pep talks.

Over the years, I've had the privilege of observing pep talks all day long on seismic crews, construction sites, production platforms, processing plants, wire line, drilling operations, rig moves and so on. But not once have I left not feeling maybe the crew could have done better with the shape and content of the core messages thereof. This is because I am of the view that safety messages are only helpful if they are clear and to the point, with little or no ambiguity, if any at all. Unfortunately, this is not always the case.

Now 5-minutes is not a great deal of time for even the most gifted and skillful of speakers to nail  home  the key safety dos and don'ts of the job soon to commence. So most of these talks frequently average out to be sing songs and prayerful affairs in the end, with generalized 'messages' like be 'your brother's keeper', 'safety is everybody's business', 'you all know what to do', blah, blah, blah. Oh, really? If they knew what to do  then why waste the precious five minutes? Why not simply let them off on their way to go do what they know how to do best? Why don't they just drain their cups of tea and coffee and step out gallantly to go be their brother's keeper since safety is everybody's business? Why not?

Truth is it doesn't work that way. You see, to make that 5-minutes productive and worthwhile, hazards of the impending job must be isolated, stripped of jargons, examined in the detail to remove doubts and uncertainties. Doubts and uncertainties regarding what to do, who's to do it, when and where, with what and how, must be clearly addressed, otherwise complications may set in and safety of man, operation and the environment could be compromised with telling results. Workplace downgrading events occur round the clock mostly due to the fact that at some critical point in time, employees hit that mental blank space where they're lost as to what to do next to proceed safely, the rest as they say becomes history, in the aftermath of what is commonly referred to as an accident.

Pep talks should therefore stress the essentials of job safety, job organization, job interface, teamwork for a common objective, job competence, tool selection and use,  communication, supervision, etc. Prime objective of any pre-job talk should be to arm the crew with helpful point-of-application safety tips to ensure the task is accomplished safely and in time. Generalizations, prayerful exhortations and celestial injunctions have their places but certainly not in a pre-job 5-Minute Safety Pep Talk.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ACCIDENT IS MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN

Any accident is money down the drain, pure and simple. No two ways about it.

So I am pained and amused at the same time whenever I hear people chuckling that what 'happened' to them was 'nothing' because 'NOTHING' happened. The NOTHING being a reference to the fact that the incident occasioned no injury or apparent damage. How interesting? Interesting because that kind of talk or line of thinking can only get you into some BIGGER trouble in due course if you do not begin to rethink the way you see things soon enough.

Now consider that even for a near miss incident, which roughly translates to an unplanned event that did not result in injury, illness, or damage - but had the potential to do so - there are costs. They may not be apparent but they sure are there, quietly chipping away at your business bottom line. To illustrate: imagine that your construction site employees are beavering away with gusto, chasing the next milestone, when a 'Tech' on the fif…

HOW MUCH DOES A NEAR MISS INCIDENT COST?

In 'ACCIDENT IS MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN', we tried illustrating  how a NOTHING HAPPENED near miss incident of a hammer accidentally slipping off a technician's grasp, falling through a considerable height and landing safely between two busy foremen, with no damage to property or injury to anyone on site resulted in so much useful production time loss. A conservative computation of the time-cost estimate showed what seemed to be a 'harmless' incident costing the site company management a hefty 3.4 Man-Days lost time in direct costs! The exercise ended without considering the 'POTENTIAL' of the occurrence.

'POTENTIAL' simply refers to the probability of a much more consequential outcome by chance or slightly altered circumstances given the number of people exposed to the threat at the time. This is usually what constitutes the difference between a 'NOTHING HAPPENED' incident, a disabling/ serious property damage one or a fatality. That the people…